I didn't participate in the poll because I'm not a big "what if" guy.
I will say this - Scioscia and Bill Stoneman's biggest impact was in the way they changed the culture of the Angels as an organization. Together they instilled a certain way of playing the game, set expectations, etc. and they did that together. They were on the same page. It was a great partnership. The Angels success can be directly tied to that partnership.
The organization has changed. The culture is different. Baseball has changed.
That being said, I have no doubt Mike Scioscia could be successful anywhere, but he would still need a partner on the GM side. He can't do both. That's not to say he should have a certain level of autonomy. I just think the days of a manager setting the tone for an organization may have passed. Maybe not. I don't know for sure.
I miss Scioscia. I miss his leadership. He never made it about himself. Never. He never wanted to be the focal point. He always gave credit and never took it.
I especially admired the way he navigated the team through the death of Nick Adenhart.
I just admire Mike Scioscia, the man and I hope he's happy with whatever he's doing now. He gave me a lot of good memories and I will always be grateful for that.