Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Trumped


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Tank said:

and it's a rare day that the EC is used in comparison with slavery. well done!

At the Philadelphia convention, the visionary Pennsylvanian James Wilson proposed direct national election of the president. But the savvy Virginian James Madison responded that such a system would prove unacceptable to the South: “The right of suffrage was much more diffusive [i.e., extensive] in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of Negroes.” In other words, in a direct election system, the North would outnumber the South, whose many slaves (more than half a million in all) of course could not vote. But the Electoral College—a prototype of which Madison proposed in this same speech—instead let each southern state count its slaves, albeit with a two-fifths discount, in computing its share of the overall count.

Virginia emerged as the big winner—the California of the Founding era—with 12 out of a total of 91 electoral votes allocated by the Philadelphia Constitution, more than a quarter of the 46 needed to win an election in the first round. After the 1800 census, Wilson’s free state of Pennsylvania had 10% more free persons than Virginia, but got 20% fewer electoral votes. Perversely, the more slaves Virginia (or any other slave state) bought or bred, the more electoral votes it would receive. Were a slave state to free any blacks who then moved North, the state could actually lose electoral votes.

If the system’s pro-slavery tilt was not overwhelmingly obvious when the Constitution was ratified, it quickly became so. For 32 of the Constitution’s first 36 years, a white slaveholding Virginian occupied the presidency.

Southerner Thomas Jefferson, for example, won the election of 1800-01 against Northerner John Adams in a race where the slavery-skew of the electoral college was the decisive margin of victory: without the extra electoral college votes generated by slavery, the mostly southern states that supported Jefferson would not have sufficed to give him a majority. As pointed observers remarked at the time, Thomas Jefferson metaphorically rode into the executive mansion on the backs of slaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • UndertheHalo

    3006

  • Lou

    2898

  • Jason

    2776

  • Taylor

    2735

7 hours ago, Tank said:

so wait, did you vote at all in this past election? if not, i'm not sure what all your fussing is about.

and it's a rare day that the EC is used in comparison with slavery. well done!

Well there’s been lots of comparisons of what’s happening at the border with the holocaust, so why stop there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

At the Philadelphia convention, the visionary Pennsylvanian James Wilson proposed direct national election of the president. But the savvy Virginian James Madison responded that such a system would prove unacceptable to the South:

This is an interesting perspective on history.  Seeing as the idea of a direct election was soundedly defeated almost unanimously.  

image.png

And it wasn't just slave states that objected. Consider the New Jersey Plan from what was clearly not a slave state. Under the plan there would have only been one legislative house with one vote from each state. The executive would have been chosen from this house. Could you imagine the shit show this country would be today if THAT was the law of the land? Ironically you'd certainly prefer the Virginia Plan over the New Jersey Plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day you just can't trust human beings to do the right thing. This is downright nefarious and it sucks that a fucking clown of a POS human being can say everything is fake news and we can't really blame people for giving that credence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Lou said:

Stormy is doing more than anyone here about the problem.

I went down to El Paso to do the same. I was kindly asked "For the love of God please stop". There was then a lot of yelling then darkness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump Jun 13

Just landed - a long trip, but everybody can now feel much safer than the day I took office. There is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea. Meeting with Kim Jong Un was an interesting and very positive experience. North Korea has great potential for the future!

Quote

 

ABC News‏Verified account @ABC 4h4 hours ago

NEW: Pres. Trump notifies Congress of decision to continue national emergency over North Korea, "citing existence and risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula." https://abcn.ws/2tl6jng

 

strange as trump isn't known to embellish anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...