Trumped

[Ace-Of-Diamonds]

10 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I expect honesty from my president,

Are you kidding?

 

OK I expect at least a little honesty. More than I'm getting from Trump and Sarah and the rest of the White House cronies. Maybe expect is a little much, I would appreciate some honesty anyway.

[Ace-Of-Diamonds]

1,628 lies or half truths is a year must be a new record. That's nearly 4.5 lies per day.

[Mark68]

[mtangelsfan]

1 minute ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

OK I expect at least a little honesty. More than I'm getting from Trump and Sarah and the rest of the White House cronies. Maybe expect is a little much, I would appreciate some honesty anyway.

You should be super disappointed then.  I'm 53 years old and can't remember a time when I felt I was getting the whole truth from a president.

I think you need to set the bar lower in this instance.  I can't stand Trump but here is a question for you:

How would the country be different if Clinton had won?

[yvangelfan]

[yvangelfan]

[yvangelfan]

[Ace-Of-Diamonds]

[RallyMo]

18 minutes ago, Mark68 said:

 

5 minutes ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

Why are you guys engaging the troll?

[Mark68]

Well, triggering and all that...

[Ace-Of-Diamonds]

20 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

How would the country be different if Clinton had won?

I can think of a few differences. DACA wouldn't be under attack. We wouldn't have a 20 something kid in charge of the war on drugs. We wouldn't have Trump's son in Law with no diplomatic experience trying to negotiate peace in the middle east. We would still be part of the Paris climate agreement. We wouldn't have wasted 1 year talking about a wall that will never be built. We wouldn't have a man beholding  to the fossil fuel industry heading the EPA. I could go on, but you get the picture.

PS. less stupid remarks needing to be apologized for like shithole countries, less Twitter rants.

[fan_since79]

1 hour ago, Mark68 said:

Both forms of democracy, where the leadership is elected by the voters (indirect democracies are still democracies).

Prime Ministers in Britain are not directly elected by the people. The leader of the majority party in the House of Commons is appointed to the position.

 

[mtangelsfan]

4 minutes ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

I can think of a few differences. DACA wouldn't be under attack. We wouldn't have a 20 something kid in charge of the war on drugs. We wouldn't have Trump's son in Law with no diplomatic experience trying to negotiate peace in the middle east. We would still be part of the Paris climate agreement. We wouldn't have wasted 1 year talking about a wall that will never be built. We wouldn't have a man beholding  to the fossil fuel industry heading the EPA. I could go on, but you get the picture.

PS. less stupid remarks needing to be apologized for like shithole countries, less Twitter rants.

Do you believe that DACA should just be perpetually continued even though the executive branch created it?  In other words, shouldn't the DACA issue be a congressional one?

The rest is just subjective.  Its not like Hillary had the best track record on international affairs.  So other than DACA nothing substantive.

[Thomas]

27 minutes ago, RallyMo said:

Why are you guys engaging the troll?

YV or the POTUS?

[InsideThePark]

3 hours ago, LHalo said:

Probably just wants to spend more time with his family. lulz

 

McCabe voted in the Republican primary and didn't vote in the general election.

But whatever, that's one man down on the Secret Society.

[Mark68]

11 minutes ago, fan_since79 said:

Prime Ministers in Britain are not directly elected by the people. The leader of the majority party in the House of Commons is appointed to the position.

 

It's still a democracy. The PM is the leader of the majority party (or, occasionally, the coalition). The members of Parliament are directly elected by the people. Just because the monarch is the nominal head of state and the PM is not directly elected to his/her position (which is true in most parliamentary systems) doesn't make it not democratic.

[Thomas]

10 minutes ago, InsideThePark said:

But whatever, that's one man down on the Secret Society.

Or is it... <scary eerie noises>

[InsideThePark]

Next on the Trumper hit list: Rod Rosenstein, a lifelong Republican.

[yvangelfan]

2 hours ago, mtangelsfan said:

You should be super disappointed then.  I'm 53 years old and can't remember a time when I felt I was getting the whole truth from a president.

I think you need to set the bar lower in this instance.  I can't stand Trump but here is a question for you:

How would the country be different if Clinton had won?

Kim Jong  Un would have nuked us by now.

[red321]

I'm not sure that matters to Republicans at this point.

Rosenstein is next and then either they go directly after Mueller or try and put someone in place who they can use to "try and reign him in".

 

 

 

[UndertheHalo]

Lol.  Thank goodness the orange retard is around to save us from Kim Jong Un. 

Edited January 29, 2018 by UndertheHalo

[yvangelfan]

6 hours ago, Lou said:

 

Please note: Bill is looking away...

[Adam]

14 minutes ago, red321 said:

I'm not sure that matters to Republicans at this point.

Rosenstein is next and then either they go directly after Mueller or try and put someone in place who they can use to "try and reign him in".

 

 

 

 

Best period of time EVER!

[mtangelsfan]

16 minutes ago, red321 said:

I'm not sure that matters to Republicans at this point.

Rosenstein is next and then either they go directly after Mueller or try and put someone in place who they can use to "try and reign him in".

 

 

 

Ted Lieu?

Come on.  One of the worst people in D.C.

[yvangelfan]

5 hours ago, Adam said:

Leftists are turning on the NY Times, calling it nazi propaganda. 

This is the greatest time of politics ever

 

Sarah Kendzior‏Verified account @sarahkendzior

FollowFollow @sarahkendzior

More

Replying to @nadinevdVelde @nytimes

NYT is now a white supremacist paper. The multiple Nazi puff pieces, constant pro-Trump PR, and praise for Miller on today of all days is not exceptional -- it's the guiding ideology of the paper. I don't think every writer there shares it, but it dominates coverage #Unsubscribe

I agree, we are living in a wild time in history. The far left is eating its own and the right is slowly growing a spine