Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Trumped


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • UndertheHalo

    3006

  • Lou

    2898

  • Jason

    2776

  • Taylor

    2735

4 minutes ago, yvangelfan said:

Have you ever watched FoxNews? It might help....

 

I have; such a load of crap...

 

9 minutes ago, yvangelfan said:

Trump didn't try to win the popular vote. The electoral vote gives people in small populated States like Montana a voice, too.

And the polls were junk, too. Were you polled?

So the 1,000,000 people in Montana should have the same say as the 39M in California? The electoral college may have been needed 200 or even 100 years ago but not anymore with the instant communications of today. Even if Trump campaigned for the popular vote, do you he carries the most populist states of New York, California, and Illinois. Not a chance.

...You know what also is messed up is Trump and Sarah Huckabee always saying, "and everyone ion America knows it", to everything from no collusion, no obstruction. He didn't want to fire Muller, and he didn't say shithole countries. They are all liars...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

I have; such a load of crap...

 

So the 1,000,000 people in Montana should have the same say as the 39M in California? The electoral college may have been needed 200 or even 100 years ago but not anymore with the instant communications of today. Even if Trump campaigned for the popular vote, do you he carries the most populist states of New York, California, and Illinois. Not a chance.

...You know what also is messed up is Trump and Sarah Huckabee always saying, "and everyone ion America knows it", to everything from no collusion, no obstruction. He didn't want to fire Muller, and he didn't say shithole countries. They are all liars...

They don't.  That is what the house is for, but without the EC you guts run ram shot over the rural areas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

I have; such a load of crap...

 

So the 1,000,000 people in Montana should have the same say as the 39M in California? The electoral college may have been needed 200 or even 100 years ago but not anymore with the instant communications of today. Even if Trump campaigned for the popular vote, do you he carries the most populist states of New York, California, and Illinois. Not a chance.

...You know what also is messed up is Trump and Sarah Huckabee always saying, "and everyone ion America knows it", to everything from no collusion, no obstruction. He didn't want to fire Muller, and he didn't say shithole countries. They are all liars...

California has 55 votes in the electoral college. 

Montana has 3.

Your and idoit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

I have; such a load of crap...

 

So the 1,000,000 people in Montana should have the same say as the 39M in California? The electoral college may have been needed 200 or even 100 years ago but not anymore with the instant communications of today. Even if Trump campaigned for the popular vote, do you he carries the most populist states of New York, California, and Illinois. Not a chance.

...You know what also is messed up is Trump and Sarah Huckabee always saying, "and everyone ion America knows it", to everything from no collusion, no obstruction. He didn't want to fire Muller, and he didn't say shithole countries. They are all liars...

So NY CA and IL should automatically rule the US because of their populations? How is that a Republic? Representatives = Republic

Your news sources are junk ~ they're just an arm of the DNC, aren't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ace-Of-Diamonds said:

Even the super bias Fox gives him 45% approval rating with 53% disapprove.

If the FBI, CIA, DOJ, NBC, CBS, CNN,MSNBC, ABC, are all biased , couldn't some weasely pollster at Fox be, too?

FoxNews is more fair and balanced than anybody out there, if you care about that.  But it has it's idiots, too. (shepherd smith).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mtangelsfan said:

Easy for urban folks to say

 

1 hour ago, RallyMo said:

Easy for Podunk folks to say.

 

52 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

There is lib mentality at its finest.  Arrogant, belittling and insulting.

I responded in kind to illustrate how silly it is to paint with broad brushes.

It looks like you don't think to that's a good thing for me to do.

Noted. Please maintain your position on the high road atop your high horse. It's a solid one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, RallyMo said:

 

 

I responded in kind to illustrate how silly it is to paint with broad brushes.

It looks like you don't think to that's a good thing for me to do.

Noted. Please maintain your position on the high road atop your high horse. It's a solid one.

"Urban" and "podunk" are in kind?  Of course you would think that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

You don't see the difference?

Of course I do. If I were having this conversation with a complete stranger on the internet, I certainly would have used the term "rural."

However, given the fact that most of us have interacted on this board for years, I wouldn't think that what I felt was a jokey use of that term on this board would be evidence of me being "arrogant, belittling and insulting."

I guess it was, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I hear that kind of stuff a lot.  As if people out here are stupid or uneducated 

I bet. You'd probably have no problem believing what I hear about ALL CALIFORNIANS from some people around here. I kindly correct them (BECAUSE I'M A SMART LIBERAL) and we're good. 

Like I said, I would have used "rural" in different company.

You don't know me all that well (how many of us really do?), but you know me better than that. C'mon, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RallyMo said:

I bet. You'd probably have no problem believing what I hear about ALL CALIFORNIANS from some people around here. I kindly correct them (BECAUSE I'M A SMART LIBERAL) and we're good. 

Like I said, I would have used "rural" in different company.

You don't know me all that well (how many of us really do?), but you know me better than that. C'mon, man.

I know you weren't calling me that but that just may be because I am not originally from here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mtangelsfan said:

They don't.  That is what the house is for, but without the EC you guts run ram shot over the rural areas

There are rural areas in every state even in California. There are 41 states that have voted the same for the past 30 years, since 1992. The people in those states that vote against the state's color are the ones that don't have a voice. In fact with the EC, the election is decided by 9 states. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...