Trumped

[Ordos]

I think you got about as much hysteria as there was praise from the right for him doing so.

[Make Angels Great Again]

21 minutes ago, cezero said:

anybody arguing in favor of anything trump advocates in any way, whether it's blaming liberals for his election or otherwise, isn't a fully functional human to me.

i couldn't possibly care less what that subhuman garbage thinks about anything at all.

you can't educate those who revel in hate, fear, and ignorance. the same morons i'm talking about in 2017 would the ones talking about the positive good of slavery in 1800s, the evils of women's suffrage in the early 20th century, and advocating jim crow until the middle of this century. they're too stupid to understand it, but that's what they are.  the only thing that eradicates their ilk is time.

 

 

The hypocrisy is hilarious.

[Make Angels Great Again]

The national Guard thing. I think it's possible someone in the administration is floating deliberately fake shit to try to flush out leakers.

 

And I think Tulsi Gabbard would have beaten Trump pretty clearly if she had run and had party support.

[Stradling]

2 hours ago, colt4405 said:

Swing state libs voted for Trump? The "party of responsibility" should try taking some responsibility for the asshat in chief.

 

PS; *Their

He's your asshat in chief as well, which almost makes this embarrassment worth it.  

PS: Twat

[Spirit]

16 hours ago, Thomas said:

To be fair Cat killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Rob Goldman and framed OJ for "the lulz"

 

And his "privilege" let him get away with it. 

 

 

[Adam]

[Lou]

EDIT: no idea how this was attributed to Strad. It was a quote by @cezero

10 hours ago, Stradling said:

if you think it was a mistake to elect trump, the blame goes squarely to those who voted for him for whatever reason, including the ones listed above. blaming liberals is beyond stupid. 

would you be saying the same thing to Hillary voters if she had won? many voted for her because she isn't Trump, or have you forgotten the whole NotTrump hashtaggy thing? 

so, tell me, who is to blame for having Hillary as the only other viable choice? at least th cons held an actual primary where they let the voters decide. 

 

Edited February 18, 2017 by Lou

[Spirit]

27 minutes ago, Adam said:

 

False equivalency!!! 

 

 

 

 

[Jay]

8 hours ago, cezero said:

anybody arguing in favor of anything trump advocates in any way, whether it's blaming liberals for his election or otherwise, isn't a fully functional human to me.

i couldn't possibly care less what that subhuman garbage thinks about anything at all.

you can't educate those who revel in hate, fear, and ignorance. the same morons i'm talking about in 2017 would the ones talking about the positive good of slavery in 1800s, the evils of women's suffrage in the early 20th century, and advocating jim crow until the middle of this century. they're too stupid to understand it, but that's what they are.  the only thing that eradicates their ilk is time.

 

Yeah those Democrats were pricks...

 

[Lou]

18 hours ago, Ordos said:

I think it's a little early to start crowning the end of the Dems here. Do remember W's fear that he would be the last GOP President

I recall vividly the crowning of the end of the Republican Party here both in 2008 and 2012

[Lou]

16 hours ago, Angels#1Fan said:

Another asinine comment.

I seriously doubt that my vote in California for Biden helped elect Trump.

neither did anyone's vote for Trump in CA, yet you have no problem blaming those that voted for him. 

Edited February 18, 2017 by Lou

[Ordos]

Exactly the point. Back and forth we swing, and still get stuck with bad choices on both sides.

[Lou]

2 minutes ago, Ordos said:

Exactly the point. Back and forth we swing, and still get stuck with bad choices on both sides.

 I agree. however, at least the reps allowed voters decide who their candidate would be. Hillary was never, ever not going to be the dem's candidate, especially with the bullshit Super Delegates. 

[Spirit]

21 minutes ago, Lou said:

I recall vividly the crowning of the end of the Republican Party here both in 2008 and 2012

 

2008 and 2012?  How about Tuesday morning Nov. 8, 2016?

 

 

 

[Ordos]

7 minutes ago, Lou said:

 I agree. however, at least the reps allowed voters decide who their candidate would be. Hillary was never, ever not going to be the dem's candidate, especially with the bullshit Super Delegates. 

Does that say more about the poor choices of the DNC, or the poor choices of the GOP reps?

[Lou]

6 minutes ago, Geoff said:

 

2008 and 2012?  How about Tuesday morning Nov. 8, 2016?

good point.

but later that evening....

[Lou]

it was an epic night for watching television 

[the dude abides]

25 minutes ago, Geoff said:

 

2008 and 2012?  How about Tuesday morning Nov. 8, 2016?

 

Lol.

Touché.

[gotbeer]

28 minutes ago, Lou said:

 I agree. however, at least the reps allowed voters decide who their candidate would be. Hillary was never, ever not going to be the dem's candidate, especially with the bullshit Super Delegates. 

The one that really got me.  Was I forget what north eastern state.  But Bernie won the state.  Then they announced that Clinton got a majority of the delegates.  That was a WTF moment, and introduction to superdelegates.  Guess I never really cared to follow the shenanegans of the R and D's too much since I usually sign up as an I. 

[Lou]

41 minutes ago, Ordos said:

Does that say more about the poor choices of the DNC, or the poor choices of the GOP reps?

and therein lies the difference. at least the GOP allowed voters to decide. the DNC chose Hillary before the populace had a chance to vote. 

[Lou]

this is my favorite moment of the entire election process

 

[Jason]

3 minutes ago, Lou said:

this is my favorite moment of the entire election process

 

Maybe that sigh wasn't a complaint but her insides tingling over a picture of Hillary

[Lou]

who loves a good comedy?

 

Edited February 18, 2017 by Lou

[Jay]

Watching that Rachel Maddow/MSNBC/CNN clip that @Lou posted, it becomes clear how AW libs formulate their political prognostications.

 

[Blarg]

I'm just going to throw this out there and see what anyone thinks of it. In the national election, when you write in a candidate that isn't even running for office, are you not part of the systemic problem of our election process? You have trivialized the election to the point Mickey Mouse is your idea of a protest vote, that you didn't even try to find a solution. So why be angry at the results?