Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Trumped


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • UndertheHalo

    3006

  • Lou

    2898

  • Jason

    2776

  • Taylor

    2735

42 minutes ago, Glen said:

Wow. So much bullshit:

Despite Mr. Flynn’s earlier denials, his spokesman told the Post that “while he had no recollection of discussing sanctions, he couldn’t be certain that the topic never came up.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, RallyMo said:

Wow. So much bullshit:

Despite Mr. Flynn’s earlier denials, his spokesman told the Post that “while he had no recollection of discussing sanctions, he couldn’t be certain that the topic never came up.”

"Current and former U.S. Officials"

Seriously nobody except the NY Times reporter even knows who the hell is saying this. Such a shit rag. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nate said:

American tax payers are spending $1 million a day so the first lady can live in NY and not at the white house like usual.

I don't hear cons complaining about wasting money though, imagine what 365 million dollars a year could do for our troops, or infrastructure ;)

She would have her own detail no matter where she was. Michelle was all over the country during her tenure as First Lady. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Lawrence said:

"Current and former U.S. Officials"

Seriously nobody except the NY Times reporter even knows who the hell is saying this. Such a shit rag. 

FFS, that's such bullshit. Unnamed sources have existed forever. Furthermore, given the temperament of our Trump and Bannon, it sure seems that this is how info that goes against anything is going to be distributed. They're vindictive assholes. Stop whining and get used to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Lawrence said:

She would have her own detail no matter where she was. Michelle was all over the country during her tenure as First Lady. 

Except for when she, you know, actually lived in the White House.

Otherwise, yeah, exactly the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, nate said:

American tax payers are spending $1 million a day so the first lady can live in NY and not at the white house like usual.

I don't hear cons complaining about wasting money though, imagine what 365 million dollars a year could do for our troops, or infrastructure ;)

It could pay for 3 minutes and 27 seconds of Bernie's healthcare plan!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I don't really give a rat's ass.  There are so many other issues I have with Trump.  It is just funny to me how quickly folks want to believe anything that supports their position, even if no evidence is provided.

It's our nature. You do it, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

I don't really give a rat's ass.  There are so many other issues I have with Trump.  It is just funny to me how quickly folks want to believe anything that supports their position, even if no evidence is provided.

It's definitely true that Melania and Barron aren't living in the White House,  and that costs taxpayers extra money. Republicans used to care about stuff like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lawrence said:

Exactly. I don't really care if Flynn talked to the Russians before the inauguration anyway. It's not like Trump wasn't going to be President after the election.

Man, the list of things cons stopped caring about after November 8 keeps getting longer every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nate said:

American tax payers are spending $1 million a day so the first lady can live in NY and not at the white house like usual.

I don't hear cons complaining about wasting money though, imagine what 365 million dollars a year could do for our troops, or infrastructure ;)

honest question - is this money being taken from some other service that is normally provided or is this a budgeted thing? and how does it compare to what is normally spent to protect the first family? anyone know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...