Trumped

[Make Angels Great Again]

Hahaha, "he didn't do it in a nice enough way"

 

You guys make me laugh. I bet he could shit unicorns and you'd find a way to criticize it.

[arch stanton]

And he could shit puppies then stomp their guts out and you'd circle the wagons and defend him to the death

[Make Angels Great Again]

Wrong.

[red321]

3 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

Wrong.

http://www.snopes.com/teddy-roosevelt-anger-a-liberal-quote/

[Make Angels Great Again]

Nice pull.

He may or may not have said it, but it's pretty damn accurate.

[Blarg]

17 minutes ago, arch stanton said:

It was the obvious thing to do but he had to stay true to his personality and be a jackass about it.

I think you are losing your perspective, Arch. MAGA is a dipstick but you don't have to jump on everything he posts like Stradling does with Claude. This is just a tweet and not even close to being controversial.

[Adam]

[Make Angels Great Again]

<3 you too Blarg.

[arch stanton]

Here's my take on the conversation

Advisor:I really think you should put your business in trust

Trump: No. Nothing can make me do that. It's my business and I'll run it if I want

Advisor: If you do that then everyone will insist on seeing your tax returns

Trump: No way. Not going to show them. I don't care what other presidents did

Advisor; then even the Republicans will turn on you and you'll get one last opportunity to be a grandstanding boob at your very own impeachment trial

Trump: Ok do it. but not because I have to. It's because I want to

[arch stanton]

2 minutes ago, Blarg said:

I think you are losing your perspective, Arch. MAGA is a dipstick but you don't have to jump on everything he posts like Stradling does with Claude. This is just a tweet and not even close to being controversial.

touche

[red321]

1 minute ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

Nice pull.

He may or may not have said it, but it's pretty damn accurate.

He didn't say it...it's a bullshit quote. One quick search would have told you that.

[Blarg]

1 minute ago, arch stanton said:

touche

Did you just get autocorrected?

 

[Blarg]

2 minutes ago, red321 said:

He didn't say it...it's a bullshit quote. One quick search would have told you that.

He did one quick search, how do you think he found it?

[Blarg]

6 minutes ago, Adam said:

And this is why Adam has back problems.

[red321]

1 hour ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

Sorry for the Nate-like tweet storm. Spin it lefties.

I'm not sure what you are looking to have spun.

He said he was going to do this during the primaries, he then backtracked...now he's doing what he said he was going to do which was always a farce.

This isn't the actual issue though. Having a blind trust, run by your adult children who are your closest advisors isn't a blind trust...especially when you have them in your meetings with foreign leaders. We also do not have a clear picture of what businesses he has pieces of because he won't release his tax returns. For example...he has investments in pipeline activities his administration now has approval over. He owes money to banks (like Goldman Sachs), and foreign banks...but nobody has a clear picture of that.

This is the issue, not a "blind trust" run by his children.

[red321]

6 minutes ago, Blarg said:

He did one quick search, how do you think he found it?

reddit...aka the millennial version of fw: fw: fw:

[Make Angels Great Again]

11 minutes ago, red321 said:

reddit...aka the millennial version of fw: fw: fw:

[Make Angels Great Again]

16 minutes ago, red321 said:

I'm not sure what you are looking to have spun.

He said he was going to do this during the primaries, he then backtracked...now he's doing what he said he was going to do which was always a farce.

This isn't the actual issue though. Having a blind trust, run by your adult children who are your closest advisors isn't a blind trust...especially when you have them in your meetings with foreign leaders. We also do not have a clear picture of what businesses he has pieces of because he won't release his tax returns. For example...he has investments in pipeline activities his administration now has approval over. He owes money to banks (like Goldman Sachs), and foreign banks...but nobody has a clear picture of that.

This is the issue, not a "blind trust" run by his children.

 

People like you won't be happy unless he were to sell his entire enterprise.

[Make Angels Great Again]

1 hour ago, Jay said:

It won't be enough.

 

Looks like you were right.

[gotbeer]

17 minutes ago, red321 said:

I'm not sure what you are looking to have spun.

He said he was going to do this during the primaries, he then backtracked...now he's doing what he said he was going to do which was always a farce.

This isn't the actual issue though. Having a blind trust, run by your adult children who are your closest advisors isn't a blind trust...especially when you have them in your meetings with foreign leaders. We also do not have a clear picture of what businesses he has pieces of because he won't release his tax returns. For example...he has investments in pipeline activities his administration now has approval over. He owes money to banks (like Goldman Sachs), and foreign banks...but nobody has a clear picture of that.

This is the issue, not a "blind trust" run by his children.

This a weird issue.  One that I would have thought would have been brought up at some point during the elections.

But I see it as no different than Hillary leaving the Clinton foundation to be run by Chelsea if she won.  When she was clearly involved in some questionable moves regarding the foundation when she was Secretary of State. 

I don't agree with either, but it is what it is, and it's too late to cry wolf now.

[red321]

5 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

 

People like you won't be happy unless he were to sell his entire enterprise.

As compared to fellating him for a grandiose proclamation that he was going to do nothing about his conflicts of interest I'm comfortable with that

[red321]

4 minutes ago, gotbeer said:

This a weird issue.  One that I would have thought would have been brought up at some point during the elections.

But I see it as no different than Hillary leaving the Clinton foundation to be run by Chelsea if she won.  When she was clearly involved in some questionable moves regarding the foundation when she was Secretary of State. 

I don't agree with either, but it is what it is, and it's too late to cry wolf now.

It was...repeatedly...but Hillary sent an email...

[Make Angels Great Again]

You seemed to have no issue with Clinton's conflicts.

[mtangelsfan]

You expect folks who dislike Trump to start liking him?

That didn't work with Bush, it didn't work with Obama and it isn't going to work now.

[Adam]

So is Trump just setting Romney up to humiliate him?