Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Trumped


Recommended Posts

On 10/13/2017 at 8:36 PM, nate said:

Religion is a vessel for people to act superior and create conflict.

there are certainly people that make this a true statement, whether fanatics in the middle east or fanatics in the bible belt, but the vast majority of religious people i've encountered throughout my life are the exact opposite of what you think is true for all.

i'm sorry that you feel this way about all people who are religious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • UndertheHalo

    3006

  • Lou

    2898

  • Jason

    2776

  • Taylor

    2736

14 hours ago, nate said:

You are ignoring that Christians also have stymied many types of scientific research because it is against god's wish.

Finally, as I already said, instead of building churches you could have been building things that actually help.  Instead of studying a 2k year old text, you could be studying science and technology.  Instead of helping an entire region that is decimated by poor living conditions, you brush them off because they don't worship the same god as you.

Can't it be both? There are plenty of Christians who believe in the sanctity of Scripture but still value science. That may seem like an oxymoron to you, but it doesn't need to be. I'm a fan of science because I believe in God. Since I believe God created the universe, I see science as an explanation for how the universe he created works. In my opinion, an anti-science Christian is an oxymoron.

I can tell you dozens of other stories of churches that are investing time, money, personnel, and creativity in providing for the physical needs of people. Yes, the reason they do it is because they believe every human being was created in God's image and is of infinite value and worth. You may not like the motive, but do you really have a problem with churches tackling food insecurity, poverty, starvation, lack of clean water, etc.?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Taylor said:

Can't it be both? There are plenty of Christians who believe in the sanctity of Scripture but still value science. That may seem like an oxymoron to you, but it doesn't need to be. I'm a fan of science because I believe in God. Since I believe God created the universe, I see science as an explanation for how the universe he created works. In my opinion, an anti-science Christian is an oxymoron.

I can tell you dozens of other stories of churches that are investing time, money, personnel, and creativity in providing for the physical needs of people. Yes, the reason they do it is because they believe every human being was created in God's image and is of infinite value and worth. You may not like the motive, but do you really have a problem with churches tackling food insecurity, poverty, starvation, lack of clean water, etc.?  

I prefer my charities to be grounded in reality.  And I desperately look forward to the day when people in poor countries stop talking about god every time something bad happens and instead talk about how they can fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this isn't great.  

There was a pretty striking finding in Thursday's Quinnipiac University poll: Fully 46 percent of Republicans — a plurality — said they would support a preemptive strike against North Korea.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/10/14/almost-half-of-republicans-want-war-with-north-korea-says-a-new-poll-is-it-the-trump-effect/?utm_term=.9c336ad55121

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

Well, this isn't great.  

There was a pretty striking finding in Thursday's Quinnipiac University poll: Fully 46 percent of Republicans — a plurality — said they would support a preemptive strike against North Korea.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/10/14/almost-half-of-republicans-want-war-with-north-korea-says-a-new-poll-is-it-the-trump-effect/?utm_term=.9c336ad55121

Idiots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mtangelsfan said:

Building roads, hospitals, schools and wells isn't helping to fix it?

 

apparently not. my men's chorus paid for three wells to be dug in mozambique, but i guess we inadvertently did it for self-serving reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UndertheHalo said:

Well, this isn't great.  

There was a pretty striking finding in Thursday's Quinnipiac University poll: Fully 46 percent of Republicans — a plurality — said they would support a preemptive strike against North Korea.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/10/14/almost-half-of-republicans-want-war-with-north-korea-says-a-new-poll-is-it-the-trump-effect/?utm_term=.9c336ad55121

So many morons out there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tank said:

apparently not. my men's chorus paid for three wells to be dug in mozambique, but i guess we inadvertently did it for self-serving reasons.

Shitty part is you make everyone listen to your chorus sing the wheels on the bus while lowering and raising the bucket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the significant time spent by those in government and media talking about how scary North Korea is, I'm honestly surprised the number isn't higher. The human reaction of lashing out when encountering fear and insecurity is nearly universal and quite predictable. I would suppose the relatively moderate number for supporting preemptive action indicates a rather large number of people not paying attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

North Korea has a stockpile of ICBM missiles waiting for warheads. They are not just testing one or two they have on hand, they are testing for the entire arsenal. 

Their strategy isn't based around launching on the US but rather to force the hand to release North Korea from economic sanctions and annexing South Korea. The only end game they can come up with is a nuclear threat, having no other leverage.

Jong Un's latest speach had almost everything to do with the economy and little to nothing about missiles or nuclear weapons. This is a country being strangled to death by having no trade partners. If it continues his government will lose the people's faith, they can't afford another humanitarian crisis like the March of Suffering where an estimated 3 million died of starvation from '94-98. 

So on one hand there is no immediate threat as long as North Korea can hold it's own economically. If that falters they have to do something and that something could be catastrophic. Kind of a charge of the light brigade, knowing the outcome will be failure but making martyrs out of the Kim dynasty. In the process South Korea, Japan and the US will take a hit like never before.

That is why the DoD is looking seriously at a preemptive strike. The region cannot be stabilized by a fully nuclear armed North Korea. 

Edited by Blarg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, tennischmp said:

The bodies of 4 US soldiers ambushed in Niger were returned home this weekend, Trump was golfing

You do realize dead soldiers come home every week? You expected Trump to be on the tarmac saluting? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...