Joe Biden

[tdawg87]

3 minutes ago, mmc said:

You make some decent points here tdawg but this post being a response to someone criticizing Hunter Biden makes it pretty gay

Well I'm extremely gay.

[mtangelsfan]

3 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

Did you vote for Trump, AO?

Doesn't make either one less douchy

[tdawg87]

9 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

Doesn't make either one less douchy

That was the entire point.

[Kotchman]

52 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Q2: How will this affect U.S. oil and gas production?

A2: Federal land accounts for about 24 percent of oil and gas production in the United States, mainly in the offshore Gulf of Mexico. But since companies with existing leases will not be affected, the near-term impact on exploration and production as well as royalties to states will be limited. With more than 26 million onshore acres and 12 million offshore acres already under lease, there is a deep inventory of exploration opportunities. Companies may have secured more onshore and offshore permits in recent lease sales in anticipation of a policy change by the Biden administration. A more permanent leasing ban would have a significant impact, although visible offshore production declines may not materialize for up to 10 years,

Also:

Federal judge reverses Biden's ban on new oil and gas leases for federal lands and waters, dealing blow to climate change activists - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-ban-new-oil-gas-leases-federal-lands-waters-judge-reverses/

 

 

 

If his first actions didn’t limit supply and increase prices , why did he reverse part of the ban to lower prices? why did he only do 1/5th of the available land? He also significantly raised the fees so the customers could absorb those prices. Also, The Russian invasion wasn’t a surprise. A leader has to understand that a likely invasion would limit world supplies thus now is likely not the time to cut production. 

[mtangelsfan]

3 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

That was the entire point.

Ok, I was thinking the point was disqualifying AO from commenting on Biden since he voted for Trump.

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, mtangelsfan said:

Ok, I was thinking the point was disqualifying AO from commenting on Biden since he voted for Trump.

Of course you did.

[Kotchman]

It’s highly likely Joe hit that pussy too. She’s obviously a money hungry freak. Pretty sure she ducked the wealthiest dick first. 

[mtangelsfan]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

Of course you did.

Then I don't see a point to your post

[tdawg87]

Just now, mtangelsfan said:

Then I don't see a point to your post

No, you wouldn't.

[Kotchman]

Let’s not pretend Jill is the virgin marry. She pulled the Kamala Harris herself. She doesn’t teach cc classes for the Starbucks discount. Her job exposes her to ample black snakes. 

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Kotchman said:

Let’s not pretend Jill is the virgin marry. She pulled the Kamala Harris herself. She doesn’t teach cc classes for the Starbucks discount. Her job exposes her to ample black snakes. 

@mtangelsfan this is what you're siding yourself with.

[mtangelsfan]

4 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

No, you wouldn't.

Thanks for the conversation.

[mtangelsfan]

Just now, tdawg87 said:

@mtangelsfan this is what you're siding yourself with.

Really?  I didn't know I was siding with anyone.

[Kotchman]

2 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

@mtangelsfan this is what you're siding yourself with.

Do you know the background story on her and Joe?

[tdawg87]

2 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

Really?  I didn't know I was siding with anyone.

You know who you're siding with. That's why you made your initial comment.

[St1ck]

15 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

If his first actions didn’t limit supply and increase prices , why did he reverse part of the ban to lower prices? why did he only do 1/5th of the available land? He also significantly raised the fees so the customers could absorb those prices. Also, The Russian invasion wasn’t a surprise. A leader has to understand that a likely invasion would limit world supplies thus now is likely not the time to cut production. 

Short answer to my original question is: no. 

[mtangelsfan]

Just now, tdawg87 said:

You know who you're siding with. That's why you made your initial comment.

Nope

[tdawg87]

Just now, mtangelsfan said:

Nope

Fuck

[Kotchman]

1 minute ago, St1ck said:

Short answer to my original question is: no. 

It’s ok to lose. 

[Kotchman]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

Fuck

Wrong

[tdawg87]

Just now, Kotchman said:

Wrong

Shut up, cals.

[St1ck]

4 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

It’s ok to lose. 

If that makes you feel better.

[Kotchman]

4 minutes ago, St1ck said:

If that makes you feel better.

That was for you. You obviously disagree with a supply and demand economics. 

[Tank]

43 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

Do you know the background story on her and Joe?

i saw something last week that said she was the babysitter for his kids. have never heard that before.

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Tank said:

i saw something last week that said she was the babysitter for his kids. have never heard that before.

I wonder why you had never heard that before.