Jump to content

  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Roe v. Wade and the new SC Justice

Tank

By Tank
in AngelsSpin.com Political Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Kevin
Kevin

I remember the simpler days when Rico would draw stick figures of Adam and Brandon talking about boobies and post the art for us all to enjoy. Trump was still a Democrat and an unknown pussy grabber.

failos
failos

if there is no sperm, you must confirm

Adam
Adam

I wonder what the second greatest photograph ever taken is.

Posted Images

RallyMo Hall of Fame

RallyMo

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, full circle said:

Or you are a rabid political partisan and your history would weaken the veracity of your claims.  The rate my professor comments from her former students are interesting.  

Hey, could you do me a favor? Could you please post a link to the rate my professor comments? Thanks in advance! I can't wait to read them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mtangelsfan Baseball Ops

mtangelsfan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Lou said:

BREAK TIME!

https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/09/21/inenglish/1537528934_632413.amp.html

 

carry on 

"Sources close to the case have told EL PAÍS that the main theory is that the reptile was inserted into the woman’s vagina either by herself or by someone else, given that it is impossible that it could have ended up inside her body any other way."

That is probably a solid theory, genius!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blarg Hall of Fame

Blarg

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Lou said:

"During their call with the committee Ford's lawyers outlined these demands, according to a source close to the process:

  • Ford will not appear any sooner than next Thursday
  • No questions to be asked at hearing by any outside counsel — only by Senators;
  • Mark Judge must be subpoenaed;
  • Kavanaugh would testify first, then Ford would testify, and Kavanaugh would have no opportunity to respond or rebut;
  • The Friday deadline for her to provide a written statement before the hearing would be waived;
  • Provide adequate security;
  • Only one pool camera in hearing room; 
  • Ford and Kavanaugh allotted the same amount of time to talk."

Why does she think she is in charge of the proceeding? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RallyMo Hall of Fame

RallyMo

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, full circle said:

My bad rally, There are no ratings for her.  

Again, interesting its all scrubbed.  

Why do you think it's scrubbed? There are tons of professors without ratings, particularly graduate level ones that like deal with far fewer students than undergrad profs. Look at a huge school like UCLA. How many ratings do the profs that deal with the most traffic there have? Not many. 

... and those reviews you were referring to earlier. They were for a completely different professor at an entirely different university who a bunch of geniuses misidentified. It turns out that two people can have the same name. Who'd have thunk it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rico Baseball Ops

Rico

Posted
Posted

Did y'all see the Ed Whelan tweets last night accusing another guy of being a lookalike of Kavanaugh and of being the "Real" attacker?  He even had floor plans of the dudes childhood home and said this was the house the attack took place.

Damn, Ed Whelan going to get sued so hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rico Baseball Ops

Rico

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Blarg said:

Still interesting that she purged her social media accounts before "anonymously" coming forward. Would like to see the perspectives she had post election. 

Yes, it makes it so much harder to tear down the accuser when they do stuff like this.  It's so not fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thomas Just Drafted

Thomas

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Rico said:

Did y'all see the Ed Whelan tweets last night accusing another guy of being a lookalike of Kavanaugh and of being the "Real" attacker?  He even had floor plans of the dudes childhood home and said this was the house the attack took place.

Damn, Ed Whelan going to get sued so hard.

I’m not even sure who could sue? He isn’t accusing her of lying per se. Can mysterious doppelgänger sue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RallyMo Hall of Fame

RallyMo

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Still interesting that she purged her social media accounts before "anonymously" coming forward. Would like to see the perspectives she had post election. 

I think just about anyone with a brain would try to lock down privacy as much as is possible if they saw a shit storm like this headed their way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...