Roe v. Wade and the new SC Justice

[fan_since79]

Hmm...you would think an awful lot of people would have heard about this and there would be multiple witnesses coming forward to corroborate her story.

The real whopper here is that Avenatti is seriously considering a 2020 run for the presidency. Really?!

[fan_since79]

She went to "well over ten parties" where girls were drugged and gang raped?

Why did she keep going to these parties?

Why didn't she warn other girls about attending these parties? 

Why didn't she tell anyone about it until now, 35+ years later and on the eve of a Senate hearing?

Why is Mark Judge the only other person named in all these charges? 

Edited September 26, 2018 by fan_since79

[fan_since79]

These 'rape parties' were held every week and nobody told their parents or the police about them?? 

Swetnick told nobody about drugging and gang rapes but continued to attend these parties, then got raped herself but still said nothing?

How did she find the sleazy Avenatti, or did he find her?

 

 

 

 

[Amazing Larry]

This is such a joke.

[fan_since79]

1 minute ago, Lhalo said:

This is such a joke.

But there are Republicans on the committee who will take this seriously.

At this point the nomination seems doomed. The hit is complete and a decent man destroyed on the altar of abortion rights.

[fan_since79]

Yawn...

Tired shtick.

 

[mtangelsfan]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[fan_since79]

Grassley: "Our lawyers are on it right now...our staff investigators..."

Forget about a hearing tomorrow, or even the foreseeable future. 

 

[Jason]

This is such a farce. I will not be a surprise if the Dems’ behavior doesn’t come back to bite them in the ass come November. I think a lot people can see what is going on here. Just ugly politics 

[fan_since79]

Just now, Jason said:

This is such a farce. I will not be a surprise if the Dems behavior doesn’t come back to bite them in the ass come November. I think a lot people can see what is going on here. Just ugly politics 

I can't wait until they try this crap with Amy Coney Barrett, who's far more conservative than Kavanaugh.

 

[mtangelsfan]

Just now, calscuf said:

I can do it too.

Yours actually deserve it.  You aren't adding to the conversation.  You are just making a tired attempt at attacking another poster.

[fan_since79]

1 minute ago, mtangelsfan said:

Yours actually deserve it.  You aren't adding to the conversation.  You are just making a tired attempt at attacking another poster.

Childish.

[fan_since79]

1 minute ago, calscuf said:

Anyone who defends a proven rapist doesn’t deserve respect.

Hillary is offended by that statement!

[Adam]

I think the auto-memes are funny

[mtangelsfan]

2 minutes ago, calscuf said:

Anyone who defends a proven rapist doesn’t deserve respect.

Proven my ass.

[mtangelsfan]

1 minute ago, Adam said:

I think the auto-memes are funny

Maybe the first two times

[Adam]

I'm kinda popping in and out of this thread. 

[mtangelsfan]

How did you get a picture of crampknees?

[Jason]

11 minutes ago, calscuf said:

Anyone who defends a proven rapist doesn’t deserve respect.

Now I know you aren't being serious at all in this thread

[Amazing Larry]

7 minutes ago, Adam said:

I'm kinda popping in and out of this thread. 

Rapist

[the dude abides]

I wonder if enrollment numbers at Georgetown Prep will decline next semester.

[RallyMo]

Man, some of y'all are continuing to back a guy with multiple sexual misconduct allegations because: sides. He shouldn't be on the damn bench with all of these allegations. Surely there will be another person to nominate that isn't accused of multiple episodes of sexual misconduct. I mean, they managed to get a guy put on the court that doesn't have multiple allegations of sexual misconduct in Gorsuch, right? Then again, maybe those of you still advocating for him think multiple accusations of sexual misconduct will be impossible to avoid in subsequent nominees. 

[Tank]

19 hours ago, mtangelsfan said:

I would pay to see Brian and Strad argue like that.

"Hey, what about me, the Honorable Lifetime?"

 

p.s. I never said that.

 

[mtangelsfan]

Just now, RallyMo said:

Man, some of y'all are continuing to back a guy with multiple sexual misconduct allegations because: sides. He shouldn't be on the damn bench with all of these allegations. Surely there will be another person to nominate that isn't accused of multiple episodes of sexual misconduct. I mean, they managed to get a guy put on the court that doesn't have multiple allegations of sexual misconduct in Gorsuch, right? Then again, maybe those of you still advocating for him think multiple accusations of sexual misconduct will be impossible to avoid in subsequent nominees. 

You don't think there is more at stake with this nominee?  I think there is.  I also find the timing of all of this to be questionable.  Maybe he did do this and shouldn't be on the bench.  Maybe he didn't and this is a tactic, if successful, will be used by both sides more often.

Your "side" wants to believe it as much as fan's side wants to not believe it.  

[fan_since79]

Gorsuch replaced Scalia. Balance on the court remains the same.

Kavanaugh would cement a 5-4 conservative majority for the first time in decades and threaten the progressive/socialist agenda in a big way.