Supreme Court decision of the day

[Jason]

5 minutes ago, fan_since79 said:

The hatred is very disturbing. The final solution is always violence with these people. If they can't win in the courts they might resort to assassination.

A very difficult summer ahead for America.

Meh, just a bunch of keyboard warriors talking shit. 

[Make Angels Great Again]

6 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Link?

This could actually be helpful to the Dems. They just need to emphasize that Trump is emboldened to do whatever he wants when he’s elected. Just like the draconian abortion laws only serve to drive more Dem voters to polls.

 

Go to the megathread on /r/politics. It's flooded with it.

 

Also just stuff like this

 

 

[St1ck]

4 minutes ago, fan_since79 said:

The hatred is very disturbing. The final solution is always violence with these people. If they can't win in the courts they might resort to assassination.

A very difficult summer ahead for America.

 

[Taylor]

8 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

 

Go to the megathread on /r/politics. It's flooded with it.

 

Also just stuff like this

 

 

That tweet is funny. And true. You need to learn to not take everything so seriously.

Also r/politics is a cesspool. Normal lefties don’t claim it.

[Taylor]

12 minutes ago, St1ck said:

 

But here are some GIFs of Dem supporters committing political violence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Taylor]

14 minutes ago, Jason said:

Then those red states will just have to deal with losing their power. Unless that is what the voters in those states really want. 

Check out how abortion initiatives have done in red states since Roe was overturned.

[Make Angels Great Again]

1 minute ago, Taylor said:

That tweet is funny. And true. You need to learn to not take everything so seriously.

Also r/politics is a cesspool. Normal lefties don’t claim it.

 

You asked for people saying it. There it is.

If "don't take everything so seriously" is a defense, I would expect a lot of latitude from the likes of yourself in the case of Trump.

[Taylor]

Just now, Make Angels Great Again said:

 

You asked for people saying it. There it is.

If "don't take everything so seriously" is a defense, I would expect a lot of latitude from the likes of yourself in the case of Trump.

You’re right. Here are my posts freaking out about this SC ruling:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[St1ck]

11 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

 

Go to the megathread on /r/politics. It's flooded with it.

 

Also just stuff like this

 

 

It's in response to Trump's lawyers.

Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4398223-trump-team-argues-assassination-of-rivals-is-covered-by-presidential-immunity/

Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution

The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.

In the hearing that reviewed a motion from Trump’s team to toss his election interference charges, Sauer argued that presidents can only be criminally prosecuted if they have already been tried and convicted by the Senate.

“He would have to be impeached and convicted,” Sauer replied.

[Amazing Larry]

3 minutes ago, St1ck said:

It's in response to Trump's lawyers.

Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4398223-trump-team-argues-assassination-of-rivals-is-covered-by-presidential-immunity/

Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution

The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.

In the hearing that reviewed a motion from Trump’s team to toss his election interference charges, Sauer argued that presidents can only be criminally prosecuted if they have already been tried and convicted by the Senate.

“He would have to be impeached and convicted,” Sauer replied.

Baited question with a truthful answer.

[St1ck]

2 minutes ago, Amazing Larry said:

Baited question with a truthful answer.

[Jason]

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vows to file impeachment articles against Supreme Court justices (thehill.com)

haha!

[Taylor]

28 minutes ago, Jason said:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vows to file impeachment articles against Supreme Court justices (thehill.com)

haha!

What’s crazy is if this was a majority liberal SC that ruled this after a Democrat president did shady shit, conservatives would be totally okay with it.

[Jason]

1 minute ago, Taylor said:

What’s crazy is if this was a majority liberal SC that ruled this after a Democrat president did shady shit, conservatives would be totally okay with it.

Maybe. The last time a SCOTUS justice was impeached was in 1804. AOC is an obnoxious blow hard and most in her party aren't going to play this game with her. 

[Taylor]

23 minutes ago, Jason said:

Maybe. The last time a SCOTUS justice was impeached was in 1804. AOC is an obnoxious blow hard and most in her party aren't going to play this game with her. 

I’m just relieved this ruling will apply equally to Republican and Democrat presidents. Now Biden can get going on some official business.

[Spirit]

15 minutes ago, Taylor said:

I’m just relieved this ruling will apply equally to Republican and Democrat presidents. Now Biden can get going on some continue on with official business.

 

FIFY

 

[Jason]

26 minutes ago, Taylor said:

I’m just relieved this ruling will apply equally to Republican and Democrat presidents. Now Biden can get going on some official business.

The status quo remains intact. 

[Make Angels Great Again]

27 minutes ago, Taylor said:

I’m just relieved this ruling will apply equally to Republican and Democrat presidents. Now Biden can get going on some continue on with official business following the whims of his handlers.

 

11 minutes ago, Spirit said:

 

FIFY

 

 

FTFBOY

 

Is there really any question about this now? Joe Biden is not running the executive branch.

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, Spirit said:

 

FIFY

 

Thank you. Now his handlers can get him to do shady shit as part of the president’s “official” duties.

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

 

 

FTFBOY

 

 

Never seen this acronym before.

[Amazing Larry]

18 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Never seen this acronym before.

Feed the fat boy!

[Make Angels Great Again]

I just made it up.

I work in the IT industry, which means I live in a world of acronyms.

[Kotchman]

59 minutes ago, Taylor said:

Thank you. Now his handlers can get him to do shady shit as part of the president’s “official” duties.

Get him? As if tapping Trump’s offices as a candidate and raiding his home for documents wasn’t shady? Hell, Biden didn’t have the decency to clear the documents in his garage before targeting Trump for the same offense 

[Taylor]

1 hour ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

I just made it up.

I work in the IT industry, which means I live in a world of acronyms.

[St1ck]

Trump, Bill Barr, and SCOTUS have really shifted a lot of power to the POTUS these last 7 years. Basically dissolved all checks and balances. I'm sure that will work out just fine.