Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Heyman: Execs have no idea why Scioscia still employed


nate

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ANAHEIMBOB said:

Let's look at the 2014 postseason.  Game  1 could have gone either way.  Scioscia  decided to play Josh Hamilton coming off an injury. He sucked before the injury and  was 0-13 in the postseason.  Fernando Salas gave up the winning run, what the fuck was Scioscia thinking ? Angels lost  the game, Scioscia tipped <over> the  scale  towards the KCR.

What tipped the scale towards KC was the bats being silent in game one and two. The game went 11 innings, at some point you have to go deeper into your pen when the bats aren't producing.  As far as Mike going with Hamilton, to me that reeks of being told to play the contract.  Sosh gets criticized for easing guys back from injury, so he chooses then to play a guy everyday coming off an injury.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ANAHEIMBOB said:

What has Scioscia done that warrants him keeping his job ?

That's not the point.  I don't care if he is the manager.  If you don't like him that's a fine opinion to have.  If you think he sucks or he's the worst, then you're a fucking idiot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has kept this team together for an entire season with only one starter that has stayed in the rotation from April on through Septrmber, Bob. 

There has been 31 pitchers called in to piece together a bullpen and rotation over the last five months. Of those only 6 had any real relevant MLB experience as starters, 3 are on the DL. The other 26 pitchers have been reclamation projects or guys that had not much more than a cup of coffee as previous experience. 

What he has done is a shit ton more than most of the league has accomplished with full rotations. The Angels are one game back in the Wildcard after having Simmons, Trout, Maybin, Escobar all serve time on the DL. 

Show some fucking respect. 

3 minutes ago, ANAHEIMBOB said:

What has Scioscia done that warrants him keeping his job ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blarg said:

He has kept this team together for an entire season with only one starter that has stayed in the rotation from April on through Septrmber, Bob. 

There has been 31 pitchers called in to piece together a bullpen and rotation over the last five months. Of those only 6 had any real relevant MLB experience as starters, 3 are on the DL. The other 26 pitchers have been reclamation projects or guys that had not much more than a cup of coffee as previous experience. 

What he has done is a shit ton more than most of the league has accomplished with full rotations. The Angels are one game back in the Wildcard after having Simmons, Trout, Maybin, Escobar all serve time on the DL. 

Show some fucking respect. 

 

Great post that guys like Boob and Jars will ignore.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Blarg said:

He has kept this team together for an entire season with only one starter that has stayed in the rotation from April on through Septrmber, Bob. 

There has been 31 pitchers called in to piece together a bullpen and rotation over the last five months. Of those only 6 had any real relevant MLB experience as starters, 3 are on the DL. The other 26 pitchers have been reclamation projects or guys that had not much more than a cup of coffee as previous experience. 

What he has done is a shit ton more than most of the league has accomplished with full rotations. The Angels are one game back in the Wildcard after having Simmons, Trout, Maybin, Escobar all serve time on the DL. 

Show some fucking respect. 

 

Yeah but 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ANAHEIMBOB said:

Let's look at the 2014 postseason.  Game  1 could have gone either way.  Scioscia  decided to play Josh Hamilton coming off an injury. He sucked before the injury and  was 0-13 in the postseason.  Fernando Salas gave up the winning run, what the fuck was Scioscia thinking ? Angels lost  the game, Scioscia tipped <over> the  scale  towards the KCR.

as a team, the halos hit .170 in that series. tell me anything the manager could have done to change that, especially when your star player, in an MVP season, hits .083 in the series. take as much time as you need to explain how this was the managers' fault.

you constantly ignore player performance in all of your uneven rants against the manager. there is absolutely no balance in your argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Blarg said:

He has kept this team together for an entire season with only one starter that has stayed in the rotation from April on through Septrmber, Bob. 

There has been 31 pitchers called in to piece together a bullpen and rotation over the last five months. Of those only 6 had any real relevant MLB experience as starters, 3 are on the DL. The other 26 pitchers have been reclamation projects or guys that had not much more than a cup of coffee as previous experience. 

What he's done?  You do know Eppler is the one who has brought in those pitchers like Bridwell that have helped keep this team in contention, not Scioscia, stop giving him credit for something he has no influence over.  It's Eppler who controls the roster and he's done a fine job of giving Scioscia the tools needed to compete.

All Scioscia controls is the bullpen matchups, pinch hitting, lineup cards etc, and in those facets he fails horribly.  We've seen too many games where Pujols kills rallies with his GIDP's, leaving pitchers in too long, not pinch running or pinch hitting with game on the line, etc.  These costly mistakes cost the team several wins.  That's the point we are arguing - his in game managing.  Not how he single handily restored a rotation in tatters and taught them how to pitch in the big leagues because he's so great at managing.

13 hours ago, Stradling said:

He's a perfectly fine manager.  Certain assholes believe he sucks, those assholes are wrong.  

I guess I'm an asshole.   I will never change my mind that Scioscia is a horrible manager and you will never change your mind that he's great and that's fine.  There's no use in trying to convince each other that the other person is wrong.  This topic has been beaten to death already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JarsOfClay said:

What he's done?  You do know Eppler is the one who has brought in those pitchers like Bridwell that have helped keep this team in contention, not Scioscia, stop giving him credit for something he has no influence over.  It's Eppler who controls the roster and he's done a fine job of giving Scioscia the tools needed to compete.

All Scioscia controls is the bullpen matchups, pinch hitting, lineup cards etc, and in those facets he fails horribly.  We've seen too many games where Pujols kills rallies with his GIDP's, leaving pitchers in too long, not pinch running or pinch hitting with game on the line, etc.  These costly mistakes cost the team several wins.  That's the point we are arguing - his in game managing.  Not how he single handily restored a rotation in tatters and taught them how to pitch in the big leagues because he's so great at managing.

I guess I'm an asshole.   I will never change my mind that Scioscia is a horrible manager and you will never change your mind that he's great and that's fine.  There's no use in trying to convince each other that the other person is wrong.  This topic has been beaten to death already.

I'm not saying he's great, I'm saying he doesn't suck and that guys like you and Bob are ridiculous thinking he does.  Also your emotion clouds your judgement of reality considering he grades out average to above average in bullpen management.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ANAHEIMBOB said:

He shouldn't have played Hamilton.  True the Angels were not hitting, but the KCR had three more hits then the Angels for the Series. They got 3 wins and scored 9 more runs then the Angels. Scioscia got schooled.

he batted hamilton down in the order IIRC, not cleanup, which was probably difficult for him to do. but for about the billionth time, player performance and the lack of it was critical in that series, not scioscia's decision on who to play. the outcome of the entire series did not swing on the addition or subtraction of hamilton and his play.

 the royals should also get some credit for having very good pitching in that series and for making the world series that year. they were a tough team and the angels clearly had their hands full.

you just don't seem to grasp that how the players perform has such a huge effect on the outcome of the game. you want to lay every single thing on the doorstep of the manager. Uneven.

Edited by Tank
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tank said:

he batted hamilton down in the order IIRC, not cleanup, which was probably difficult for him to do. but for about the billionth time, player performance and the lack of it was critical in that series, not scioscia's decision on who to play. the outcome of the entire series did not swing on the addition or subtraction of hamilton and his play.

 the royals should also get some credit for having very good pitching in that series and for making the world series that year. they were a tough team and the angels clearly had their hands full.

you just don't seem to grasp that how the players perform has such a huge effect on the outcome of the game. you want to lay every single thing on the doorstep of the manager. Uneven.

2014 ALDS seemed so much like the 2005 ALCS, except that the ChiSox starters pitched all but one or two innings in the 2005 ALCS while the Royals total staff shut down the Halos totally. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ANAHEIMBOB said:

He shouldn't have played Hamilton.  True the Angels were not hitting, but the KCR had three more hits then the Angels for the Series. They got 3 wins and scored 9 more runs then the Angels. Scioscia got schooled.

Most of that difference was courtesy of Nibs bending over for the Royals in game 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ANAHEIMBOB said:

The Angels are 12-0, when Scioscia misses a game .  Less of Scioscia = wins.  

and you still haven't addressed any of the issues i've presented - not a single one.

uneven.

Edited by Tank
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...