Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Gameday Thread: Angels @ Yankees 6/9 4:05


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 hours ago, hangin n wangin said:

Good spelling.

And don't worry about the elimination numbers. It doesn't ever have to go down because we can just throw away all of our pitchers bad starts.

first of all go fuck yourself.  i have tries just to ignore you but you refuse to ignore me. 

you onviously lnow very little about quantative analysis.  because it is common to identify outliers that skew raw numbers. 

also you a man of little imtellectual ntegrity because you made a statement that Calhoun was "clearly better than Pujols going on three years"

when i countered showing stats that your statement with figures from ESPN of WAR and OPS that shows arguably better.  

you countered saying i was wrong and used WAR from fan graphs.  you also used subjective defense saying the low WAR was Soscia fault.  meanwhile you ignored the OPS stat.

finally you defended yourself nu saying you meant third year (this)  when you actually said "going on three years".  

you may have a problem with my typos.  however you should have a greater concern over lack of intellect deduction.  Because the premise of my whole argument is that Calhoun was that Pujols was arguably better than Calhoun.  in fact i said Calhoin maybe better.  look at the statistics and that argument is still valid.

on other words care.morw about logic and leas about spelling.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stradling said:

Tanking is dumb in baseball.  Now if you trade away talent to get prospects and the team you have just isn't good enough to win that's different than "tanking".  

So what is it called when you trade prospects for non-talent and have a team that just isn't good enough to win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...