Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Hector Santiago has been just OK


Recommended Posts

The stat pundits were saying before the season that Santiago was due for major regression, while Angels fans were (wishfully) saying that he was going to be at least as good as last year or better. It seems that, so far, the stat pundits were right: Hector Santiago is an OK pitcher, a solid #4-5 type.

This is just fine with me, especially with the development of Richards and Skaggs. From what I've seen so far, both Richards and Skaggs are going to be at leaste #3 types, if not #2 types - although probably not true aces. If we just accept the fact that Santiago is the #5 starter then he fits right in. If we are, however, expecting him to be a #3 or better--like some were hoping for--then we're bound to be disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got what we got -- Santiago wasn't that great as a starter for the White Sox last year.

 

He's really a long relief/ middle inning pen guy who can also give a team some spot starts.

 

He is not a rotation guy.

 

We are making do and with the Halos offense this year, it might even work.

 

But don't expect quality starts out of Santiago........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

disarcina, I think you're right.

 

Vegas, while true I think there's an erroneous notion that command is relatively easy to come by or learn. If a pitcher hasn't learned it by age 26, they may never learn. Think Daniel Cabrera or Oliver Perez.

 

Lawrence, I expected him to be the worst of the three so am not disappointed at all. But like you implied, no matter what one's expectations were, Richards and Skaggs have been really good so it's hard to be disappointed by the rotation so far. Actually, the biggest disappointment so far has been Jered Weaver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or how about we give him...and Skaggs...and Richards more then a month in the rotation before reaching conclusions.  All three have solid stuff and belong in the rotation.  Also, there is no one on the current roster or in the system better then these three as far stating pitching goes.  Unless there is a trade, this is it, folks but still better then Hansen, Blanton, and collection of AAAA stiff they were running out last season.

Edited by mulwin444
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Define it however you want.  

 

Okayyyy then...

 

Well by my definition so far he's given the Angels 3 poor starts, 1 good but pitch inefficient start, and 1 really good start.

 

I'm not advocating yanking him from the rotation ASAP, but to say he's given the team a chance to win every time so far seems like a stretch to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that Richards, Skaggs and Santiago are all going to be inconsistent over the course of the season.  I don't think it's realistic to expect them to be much more than what Santiago is right now.  They are all young and learning how to pitch in the big leagues.  There's a learning curve and it seems like what many of the knee-jerk reactions around here seem to ignore.

 

For example, I'm sure you all remember Lackey's fifth inning meltdowns when he was younger, right?  Eventually, he ironed out the kinks and went on to become our best pitcher. 

 

I guess the point is, we will not see a finished product today, tomorrow, or quite likely, within the next two years or so with ANY of those pitchers.  I really think that this is what we're in for the foreseeable future.  Really, is it so bad?  Even though Santiago was yanked early (haha..."Yanked") the offense left guys on base all day long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santiago is fine.  He's a mid to back of the rotation guy because he allows too many base runners. 

 

There are one of two things that happen to guys like that.  They either have half a dozen starts per year that blow up their era or they find a way to hold runs down but don't get deep.  Santiago is the latter. 

 

So instead of saying that he keeps the team in the game, maybe a better way to look at it is that he doesn't totally blow up. 

 

He's gonna end up with a high 3's or low 4's era.  So you have to ask yourself what's more important to the team.  Giving up fewer runs but over less innings or allowing more runs but getting deeper?  Not getting deep, of course, relies on the pen which is an issue, but giving up fewer runs gives our offense a better chance. 

 

The other thing is that Santiago is a bit more complicated than Richards or Skaggs.  Richards main problem is that he fights his mechanics.  Skaggs is pretty straight forward.  He's got good stuff and is learning his craft. 

Santiago is emotional.  He has good not great stuff.  He lacks command and he has like 7 pitches. 

 

Also, keep in mind that Hector made 24 starts in the minors in 2011.  His first year as a starter. 

Then he went back to the pen in 2012 and was suddenly a starter in the majors in 2013.  His age doesn't match his potential development as a starter.  By contrast, Skaggs has made 100 starts.  The vast majority of which have been age and level appropriate.  Garrett is somewhere between the two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with conger: 0.71era 12.2ip 2 starts

with iannetta 7.71era 9.1ip 2 starts (not including today)

and of course they put iannetta in today.

This is why we miss Joe Madden. He was all over these situational stats when with the Angels and had Scioscia's ear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, I'm a Matt Shoemaker be liver for the rotation. If he's our 5th guy he'll give us quality innings. His command is good and his cutter/split can generate whiffs.

Give Santiago till mid-May, early June. If it's not happening, move Santiago to the back end of our bullpen.

We didn't lose the game because of Santiago or our bullpen. We lost the game because we didn't capitalize offensively against mediocre starting pitching and a Yankees bullpen that's ranked lower than ours today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...